Boy, in the past six months Nike has given me a lot of material to write about; just see these posts HERE, HERE, HERE, and HERE. Well, here is another patent application that published last week. Check out this design..... So, are they taking the adjustability band wagon too far?..... << MORE >>

If you frequent this site then you know that in the past six months I have authored several posts (HERE, HERE, and HERE) regarding some pretty cool, albeit unconventional, designs by Nike. Well, this week another Nike patent application became publicly available and it gives us a look at another interesting design that they have come up with. The patent application published as US Pub. No. 20100062874 titled “Golf Club Head and Golf Club with Tension Element and Tensioning Member,” and explains..... Interesting concept, but this is design that I would have to see to believe.....<< MORE >>

The following is a statement of what Acushnet intends to prove during the ProV1 trial. The most interesting portion contains a statement regarding how much Callaway feels they are entitled to as a result of the alleged infringement. It should be no surprise that Acushnet disagrees. Enjoy..... I actually expected the number to be even higher!....<< MORE >>

So far this week we have looked at the facts that Callaway and Acushnet agree upon and we have seen the facts that they intend to litigate; let's now look at the legal issues that will be litigated. The following is taken from Acushnet's Statement Of Issues of Law That Remain To Be Litigated; it is long, but I guarantee you will will learn a lot if you read it (and I have highlighted the most interesting portions)...... As you can see, patent law is complex and I am sure the jurors have no idea of what they will be in for!<< MORE >>

Facts are facts, right? Well, not necessarily. The following are issues of fact that will be litigated in the ProV1 dispute.....<< MORE >>

In patent litigation it is generally pretty hard for the parties to agree upon anything. Fortunately, a court can be pretty persuasive in forcing the parties to state the facts that they cannot fight about. Here are a few facts that Callaway and Acushnet have agreed upon in the ProV1 litigation.....<< MORE >>

Yesterday we looked at the jointly proposed voir dire for the ProV1 patent infringement trial; today let’s look at the jointly proposed jury instructions.... Interesting stuff. I suspect that some of you, like me, would pay to be on the jury.....<< MORE >>

Jury selection begins this Friday for the big ProV1 trial. This could be the jury that awards the largest amount of damages in golf history; but it could also be the jury that awards nada. In this case it isn’t very often that Callaway and Acushnet agree on anything, therefore let’s take a look at their jointly proposed voir dire designed to screen prospective jurors....... What are your thoughts? Are these questions good enough to identify the crazies or those with bias? I wonder if one side or the other is better off having jurors that are golfers? Interesting question that Callaway and Acushnet have probably studied in detail. What about the USGA question? Would you want people associated with the USGA on the jury, or excluded from it?.....<< MORE >>

A patent issued this week directed to a golf club manufacturing technique that is rather interesting. The patent is USPN 7,670,532 titled “Golf Club Head and Method of Making the Same,” and describes the invention as.....<< MORE >>

That’s right, green is in (and very PC). Still, I was surprised to see an Acushnet patent application publish today titled “Recyclable Golf Ball and Method Therefor.” (US Pub. No. 20100056305) Just close your eyes and imagine golf ball recycling kiosks in every pro shop. Perhaps one at the local grocery store; you know, right next to the can recycling kiosk, the change counting kiosk, the DVD rental kiosk, and the game with the hanging claw and crappy stuffed animals. I think I just heard a tear fall and hit your keyboard. When you read the number of patent applications that I do, eventually you will start to believe that kiosks are about to take over the world. So, what does Acushnet have in mind? Well, I will let the patent application explain the situation....<< MORE >>

Check out these beautiful clubs!....<< MORE >>

Last week I posted about an interesting patent application filed by Dick’s Sporting Goods. Well, the very same day a Nike patent application was published that contains some similar design attributes. Whose design do you like better?....<< MORE >>

There is no doubt that Dick’s is a major force in golf equipment retailing, yet I was still surprised this week to see that they had a patent application publish that is directed to a club head design. The patent application published as US Pub. No. 201000041495 titled “Golf Driver Head with Exchangeable Rear Sections,” which describes the invention as.... Interesting, very interesting. Look’s like the OEM’s may soon have more competition. It does make you wonder how long it will be before walking into a golf retailer will be like walking into a grocery store. Will each name brand product will have a very similar "house brand" product for sale right beside it (for 30% less)? Perhaps a little chart will even compare the ingredients.... yes, the house brand is all titanium; yes, the house brand has an MOI of 5000; yes, the house brand.....<< MORE >>

So far this week we have looked at Karsten's non-golf related patents, golf tool related patents, a golf ball patent, and his golf grip patents, therefore it is about time that we start looking at his golf club patents. Let's start with woods. I was surprised to learn that Karsten is listed as an inventor on only two wood-related patents, however we all know that the PING brand made its name with putters and irons. Karsten's first wood related patent is USPN 3625518 titled "Golf Club Head with Complex Curvature for the Sole and/or the Striking Face." The patent, which issued in 1971, describes the invention as.... << MORE >>

We have looked at Karsten's non-golf related patents, golf tool related patents, and a golf ball patent, so now let's look at his golf grip patents. He has many golf grip design patents, but only one golf grip utility patent. The 1992 utility patent is USPN 5087042 titled "Golf Club Grip," which describes the invention as.... I wonder how many of these grips have made it into golfers hands. One million? Ten million? Hundred million? Hard to guess. Stay tuned, the best is yet to come with upcoming posts covering Karsten Solheim’s inventions directed to woods, irons, and, of course, putters.....<< MORE >>

Over the past few days we have examined Karsten Solheim’s non-golf related patents, as well as his golf tool related patents; well, there is one other unusual invention and patent that most people would not typically associate with Karsten and the PING brand.... a golf ball patent. Karsten’s one and only golf ball patent is USPN 4653758, which is appropriately titled “golf ball” and issued in 1987. The patent explains..... It seems that this man of many talents also knew a thing or two about aerodynamics and golf ball manufacturing..... << MORE >>

Yesterday you learned about Karsten's non-golf related patents. Today let's look at his inventions that are golf related, but aren't the type of inventions that you would typically associate with PING. You know, some behind the scenes tools...... Neat stuff! Stay tuned, the upcoming posts will delve into the patents that reveal Karsten's true genius, including posts covering his golf grip patents, a golf ball patent, patents on woods, iron patents, and, of course, putter patents..... << MORE >>

As we approach the 10 year anniversary of the passing of one of the most prolific golf club design visionaries, a week long tribute to the inventiveness of Karsten Solheim seems appropriate. If you don’t know who Karsten is then you are probably on this site by mistake; however, you may want to check out this nice biography on the World Golf Hall of Fame website. Diehard golf geeks know that Karsten did not even take up golf until he was in his forties, and that it was not until he was in his mid-fifties that he quit his day job as an engineer at General Electric to focus on Karsten Manufacturing and build the powerhouse PING brand. There was a great portion of his life in which he did not focus on the torture that a little white ball can inflict on a person. So, without golf what is a man to focus on? Good question, let’s look at some of Karsten’s earliest non-golf inventions..... Well there you have it. Karsten was obviously an inventive person that probably learned a lot about the value of protecting intellectual property when he was at General Electric. Stay tuned, posts later this week will cover the following categories of Karsten’s inventions: golf tools, grips, balls, woods, irons, and, of course, putters..... << MORE >>

The Golf-Patents blog has revealed some pretty radical golf club designs in the past, but rarely do they originate from Karsten Manufacturing (aka PING). Therefore, when an unusual PING patent application is published it deserves a close look. This week PING had two related patent applications publish related to variable MOI driver designs, one of which is US Pub. No. 20100029402 titled “Golf Clubs With Variable Moment of Inertia And Methods Of Manufacture Thereof.”..... Wow, I suspect that design concept will surprise a lot of people; but will it ever make it to the market?.....<< MORE >>

What better way to get hit by a golf ball than playing on a compact golf course. Every golfer has played on one of those courses that squeezed 18 holes in the space that should house 14 holes. The type that has a net around at least one tee box; probably the result of a line drive to the forehead (and a lawsuit). Can you appreciate a course that takes it a step further and fits 18 holes in the space of 7 holes? Well, check out the disaster waiting to happen in disclosed in USPN 4,157,831 titled “compact golf course.”..... This wraps up a rather uneventful week of crazy golf course designs! (thankfully).....<< MORE >>

What happens when a statistics professor designs a golf course? The possibilities are endless. Actually, I don’t know if the inventor of the course of today is a statistics professor, but it wouldn’t surprise me. So, what could possibly follow a linear golf course layout, a circular layout, and a shared fairway layout (with movable trees)? A web pattern layout, of course. Today’s course is found in USPN 6,036,606 titled “Golf Course with Multi-Sequential Arrangement of Golf Links,” which explains..... You may ask, how many combinations are there? Good question. Check out the diagram below and read the subsequent paragraph...... I think I have spotted a trend; the more likely you are to receive a patent on a golf course layout, the less likely it is that most golfers will be interested in playing it!.....<< MORE >>

So far this week we have examined a linear golf course layout and a circular layout, therefore it must now be time to look at a design incorporated shared fairways. Today’s design is found in USPN 6,053,819 titled “Golf Course, Golf Park and Associated Method of Playing a Golf Game,” which describes the invention as..... What do you think of playing “back and forth along a fairway” for as long as you have reserved the course? While I love the movable tree, I think this concept might be a tough sell......<< MORE >>

Yesterday we explored a wonderfully linear golf course layout. Today, let’s take a look at a radically different design. The new design is disclosed in USPN 5,395,115 titled “Golfing Facility,” which describes the invention as..... Check out this beauty!..... I am surprised that we haven’t seen a circular TPC course, aren’t you?.....<< MORE >>

Ever wonder if you can patent a golf course’s architecture? Well, this week I will provide you with some interesting golf course layout patents that you may find hard to believe. Additionally, if you are a golf course architecture aficionado then you should avoid these posts because they will bring tears to your eyes (or make you puke)..... I am all for speeding up the pace of play, but I would prefer to play a slower round on a nice unique design rather than a blazing fast round on an, umm, less unique design....<< MORE >>

In the past I have posted, in a sarcastic manner, about driving range kiosks putting Hank Haney out of a job, but now I am starting to think we may start to see these things pop up as frequently as golf simulators. This week an interesting kiosk-type system patent issued as USPN 7,651,406 titled “Active Golf Instruction System.” Check it out.....<< MORE >>

Check out this neat little device..... The drawings come from a patent application that recently published as US Pub. No. 20100022318 titled “Golf Putting Floor Vent.” The application describes the invention as..... Who knew that traditional putting mats are dangerous!.....<< MORE >>

It may be hard to believe but I, like most golfers, occasionally get jaded after seeing training aid after training aid, none of which seem particularly helpful. Every now and then I come across one that actually seems to have some merit. Today was one of those days. USPN 7,651,405 titled “Device for Visualizing and Practicing a Correct Golf Swing” issued today and describes the patented invention as..... Check it out!.....<< MORE >>

In the past six months I have authored several posts (HERE, HERE) regarding some pretty cool, albeit unconventional, designs by Nike. Well, this week another Nike patent application became publicly available and it gives us a look at another interesting design that they have come up with. The following drawings tell the story.....<< MORE >>

I love inventions directed to conquering this maddening sport. It is a sign that human spirit is alive and well; and that some tinkerers truly believe they have invented a gadget that will make the game less frustrating for the rest of us. Sure, there are those golfers (typically the ones that throw their clubs and angrily smack their ball of the green after missing a short putt) that bash every new golf product created since the advent of laminated woods; but can you really knock a golf training product until you have tried it out? OK, I suppose there are a few (example 1, example 2, example 3) that I do draw quick conclusions about, but in general I would be willing to try any training product that the inventor really believes will help a golfer enjoy the game (provided it doesn’t look like it could inflict bodily harm). Thus, I come upon the following putting training aid invention with an open mind. Check this out.....<< MORE >>

Ever wonder if your balls were deformed? Well, if so I have found the perfect putter for you. An interesting putter was disclosed in a patent application that published this week as US Pub. No. 20100009781 titled “Putter and Golf Ball Deformity Measuring Apparatus.” The application explains....... I am not sure what to say about this one. Just because I cannot remember the last time that I wondered whether my golf ball was deformed doesn’t mean that there isn’t a huge population of golfers fixated on whether their balls are deformed. Right?.... << MORE >>

Check out these drawings from a design patent that issued to Karsten Manufacturing today!..... Does the design remind you of anything; perhaps something you see about 18 times a round?..... << MORE >>

I was honored to be a guest on the nationally syndicated Small Business Advocate® radio show this morning. Jim Blasingame and I discussed IP goals for small businesses. Feel free to listen to the interview HERE...... << MORE >>

It is hard to believe it has been almost 18 months since I wrote a post about a rather radical Taylor Made patent application. The post was titled “The Future of Taylor Made Drivers? Will This Design Ever Make it to Store Shelves?” Well, they prosecuted the patent application and paid to have it issue last week as USPN 7,641,568 titled “Golf Club Head Having Ribs.” So, maybe a club like this will make it to market someday......<< MORE >>

Following up on last year’s post “The Best and Worst Golf Club Names Filed with the USPTO so far in 2008”, let’s look at some of the more interesting golf club trademark applications filed in 2009. Here are some of my favorite names that we may see on golf clubs in 2010.....<< MORE >>

Not long ago I posted about Heavy Putter’s intent to use the trademark Heavy Wedge™ on “golf clubs”; and commented that doesn’t take a genius to speculate that those “golf clubs” might just be a new line of wedges! Well, now I can report that they also have intent to carry forward the product line to.....<< MORE >>

Can you imagine this device helping your putting?..... With that stance and grip it is no wonder that he has putting problems. The drawings come from USPN 5,752,887 titled “Golf Aid Device,” which describes the invention as.....<< MORE >>

Hermes has just the offering for the metrosexual golfer that has just about everything, except a golf bag to match his fancy luggage and man purse. Check out this bag!..... The drawings come from the recently issued design patent USPN D606,750. Classy and interesting design, but I would expect golfers that I play with to kick my rear if I every showed up carrying one of these.....<< MORE >>

The Golf Digest Hot List 2010 is out and they seemed to have overlooked an important category; namely, the shank-resistant iron category. In the past I have posted (here and here) about golfers obsession with clubs designed to prevent hosel rockets, but somehow I have overlooked this beauty of a club. Check it out.....<< MORE >>

Familiar with the TaylorMade Targa Tour Glove and its “patent pending micro-perforated leather construction to increase airflow throughout the hand and allow for 360 degree ventilation?” Nice looking glove, right. Check out the link, and these figures...... A patent application recently published directed to this perforated glove construction. The application published as US Pub. No. 20090313742 titled “Golf Glove Having Perforations,” which explains the breakthrough as..... For crying out loud, it’s a golf glove with needle holes throughout! Yes, funny ha-ha; but seriously, I truly believe that creating a well drafted patent application on a simple invention in a unique manner so that it has a shot at patentability is one of the most difficult documents to create. Unfortunately, no one will believe that statement unless they have actually done it. Oh well, such is life.....<< MORE >>

Any chance this grip can help your putting?..... The grip is disclosed in a patent that issued last week as USPN 7635309 titled “Grip Arrangement for Golf Club.” The patent describes the invention as..... It may look ridiculous, but I am not too proud to give it a try.<< MORE >>

On Monday Trisport, Ltd. and Pride Manufacturing Company, LLC, maker of Softspikes brand golf shoe cleats, sued MacNeill Engineering Company, Inc., maker of Champ brand golf shoe spikes, alleging infringement of three patents (USPN’s 5974700, 6272774, and 6810608), and accusing MacNeill of falsely marking their products with respect to USPN 5036606....... So, what’s behind the “false marking” claim?....... << MORE >>

Maybe it’s just me, but I don’t personally know a single golfer using swing trainer / swing exercise devices. However, I definitely would give one a try if I thought it had a shot at actually improving my game. Therein lies the problem, it is hard for me to look at these devices and think “that’s going to help my game, sold!” I had this same problem when reviewing a patent that recently issued as USPN 7,625,320 titled “Swing Training Apparatus and Method.” Now, I am sure it would give you a nice hip workout and all (if that’s what your looking for), but would it really help your swing? You be the judge....<< MORE >>

Check out this beauty of a putter grip!..... Ahhh, the perfect marriage of a bowling glove and a golf grip; however, think there may be some trouble getting USGA approval on this grip?....<< MORE >>

Familiar with the GolfNow tee time reservation system that seems to be pimped nonstop on The Golf Channel by the Billy Mays of golf instruction? Well, this week GolfNow was granted USPN 7,634,426 titled “Golf Reservation System,” which may surprise some people. The patent explains....<< MORE >>

Back in August I authored a post titled “US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit: ‘Irreconcilably Inconsistent Jury Verdicts’ Results in Remand for a New Trial Regarding the Original ProV1 Patent Infringement Lawsuit.” Then, in October we learned of the of the new trial dates. Well, the saga never ends, or seems to go too far. On December 11th Acushnet petitioned the Supreme Court. You may read the entire “Petition for a Writ of Certiorari” HERE, which is very interesting reading. The excellent patent law blog PatentlyO has a nice short post HERE on what Acushnet’s beef is with the Federal Circuit’s holding. Specifically, Acushnet takes issue with the Federal Circuit's holding that the "jury could have reasonably concluded that Acushnet failed to prove invalidity due to obviousness." In Acushnet's view, the appellate panel should not have given any regard to the jury's legal finding. Now, try to wrap you head around this.... there is a very real possibility that Acushnet is paying their lead litigation attorney almost as much as they pay to their highest paid players. Thus, if I were Acushnet's general counsel, I would require their entire army of outside litigation counsel to wear Titleist hats and FootJoy apparel around the clock. However, I suppose the legal fees are a drop in the bucket when you consider that Acushnet admits that it has sold nearly $2 billion worth of Pro V1 balls! That equates to selling almost $450 worth of Pro V1 balls every minute of every day for the past 8.5 years!....<< MORE >>

Brace yourself. I don’t want to get your hopes up right before Christmas, but this invention would likely change the way most of us play a round of golf. The invention is disclosed in a recently published Garmin patent application; namely, US Pub. No. 20090298605 titled “Methods and Devices for Analyzing Golf Swings.” The application explains.... Pull this off and it will be like printing money!....<< MORE >>

This summer I was fortunate to attend a long drive / trick shot demonstration by “professional long driver and golf entertainer” Tom Roskos. The guy is amazing; just try hitting a ball like THIS someday. Much of his demonstration involves amazing feats of balance, including hitting long drives while balancing on top of an exercise ball. For those of use with more human skill levels, the following invention may help out. What do you think?....<< MORE >>

What? That’s right, craters, not dimples, randomly arranged to produce excellent aerodynamic symmetry. Counterintuitive, right? Last week a golf ball aerodynamics related patent application became publically available and I could not put it down. The patent application published as US Pub. No. 20090298618 titled “Process for Designing Rugged Pattern on Golf Ball Surface.” I thought, “that’s an odd title,” but it was the first line of the Abstract section that set the hook. It reads “a golf ball has numerous craters on its surface.” Craters, really? The application starts off with a nice explanation of golf ball aerodynamics and an explanation of the USGA rules regarding the symmetry of a golf ball. I guarantee that you will learn something reading the following (unless you are a golf ball designer)....<< MORE >>

Few things put a smile on a golfer’s face like the sound of a 300 yard drive. Sure, there are a handful of drivers out there that are characterized by a rather unique sound that some, myself included, would say is hideous, but there is no doubt that the sound produced by a driver influences the purchasing decision. Every golf club manufacturer recognizes this fact. Acushnet has gone as far as designing a driver that the golfer can tune to the frequency that they desire. The Acushnet driver is disclosed in a patent application that published this week....<< MORE >>

That’s right, a combination sand wedge and putter. Not exactly the two clubs that most golfers would think of combining. Check out this club!.... Interested? I will have to pass on this golf invention....<< MORE >>